OTHER RELIGIONS UNDER ISLAM !
Naik was once asked by a non-Muslim on his TV show, "Why are non-Muslims not allowed to propagate their religion or construct their places of worship in Islamic nations, while Muslims expect the same right to be given to them in non-Muslim majority countries?"
Naik agrees that Islam does not allow a Non-Muslim to propagate or construct his places of worship in an I
Naik was once asked by a non-Muslim on his TV show, "Why are non-Muslims not allowed to propagate their religion or construct their places of worship in Islamic nations, while Muslims expect the same right to be given to them in non-Muslim majority countries?"
Naik agrees that Islam does not allow a Non-Muslim to propagate or construct his places of worship in an I
slamic
country. The furthest that a non-Muslim can go is to practice his
religion in the secrecy and privacy of his home. Naik fails to
understand what "equal rights" are. He supports Muslims being given the
same rights by the Kaffirs that the Muslims should not give to the
Kaffirs.
[edit] Rebuttal
Naik has illogically brought in the analogy of a school principal hiring a mathematics teacher and says, "Would a principal hire a teacher who says that 2+2 = 3?" He goes on to say, "Of course the principal would not hire that teacher because that teacher does not have the right math knowledge. Similarly, Muslims will not allow other religions because they are not right." The problem here is that "2+2=4" is a universal math law by definition. On the other hand, Islam is not a universal law. Muslims believe in Islam just like other people believe in their own respective religions.
He continues on, "In the Quran 3:85, it says that Islam is the only true religion." Again, he makes the mistake that all people of the world take the Qur'an as the truth.
Naik has not given any proof for why Islam is the universal truth nor for why other religions are false.
Naik says, "In matters of religion, we Muslims are confirmed true, while the non-Muslims are not. If they were confirmed, why would they follow the wrong religion?" This is nothing but illogical drivel. Islam becomes true for Muslims only because they choose to believe in it. It is not in any way "more confirmed" than other religions.
According to Naik, Muslims are 100% sure that Islam is the right religion. However, he believes that other people are not sure of their religion. The proof offered by him for this is that "these non-Muslims follow their respective false religions." Any person with some intellect can see through the drivel Naik speaks.
Has not Naik indirectly mocked and laughed at the non-Muslims? On the one hand, he "appreciates" that non-Muslims give Muslims the right to propagate Islam and build mosques in their country. On the other, he says that Muslims should never give these same rights to the non-Muslims.
Dr. Naik is “begging the question” of “truth”. It is not decided universally according to the scientific method that Islam is “God’s religion”. That is a claim that Dr. Naik has merely claimed, but not proved. He "begs" us to accept this as proven so he may win the argument. While 2 + 2 = 4 IS established by the science of mathematics, the supremacy of Islam is a religious opinion and cannot thus be supported by science. All school principals are accredited by a board of education elected by the parents and voters of the school district. No school principal in the world is appointed directly by God. All are answerable, not to God, but to those to whom they owe their job. That is an additional fallacy on the part of Dr. Naik. Scientific truth is different from religious truth. The scientific method is a very rigorous set of standards used to eliminate false conclusions. Dr. Naik is a heedless simplifier arguing (without proof) that the present-day Muslim dictatorships (such as Saudi Arabia and Taliban areas...run by despotic tyrants) are obviously the chosen representatives of Allah and run their countries according to Allah’s rules in a supremacist manner. This is his subjective opinion, but it cannot be supported by science or mathematics any more than I can prove strawberry to be superior to chocolate. Dr. Naik is intolerant of all other opinions and refuses to recognize that more than 80% of humans believe Islam to be a false, obscurantist, supremacist cult which has no right whatsoever to overrule the Universal Declaration of Human Rights...which proclaims freedom of thought and of religion. It is not proved either that Dr. Naik or his favorite dictators are God’s appointed “school masters” over the world. That would merely be his own opinion of himself. He is begging the question of Islam’s supremacy in order to justify the denial of equality, freedom of religion and other human rights to anyone who disagrees with him.
Source:-Wiki Islam.
[edit] Rebuttal
Naik has illogically brought in the analogy of a school principal hiring a mathematics teacher and says, "Would a principal hire a teacher who says that 2+2 = 3?" He goes on to say, "Of course the principal would not hire that teacher because that teacher does not have the right math knowledge. Similarly, Muslims will not allow other religions because they are not right." The problem here is that "2+2=4" is a universal math law by definition. On the other hand, Islam is not a universal law. Muslims believe in Islam just like other people believe in their own respective religions.
He continues on, "In the Quran 3:85, it says that Islam is the only true religion." Again, he makes the mistake that all people of the world take the Qur'an as the truth.
Naik has not given any proof for why Islam is the universal truth nor for why other religions are false.
Naik says, "In matters of religion, we Muslims are confirmed true, while the non-Muslims are not. If they were confirmed, why would they follow the wrong religion?" This is nothing but illogical drivel. Islam becomes true for Muslims only because they choose to believe in it. It is not in any way "more confirmed" than other religions.
According to Naik, Muslims are 100% sure that Islam is the right religion. However, he believes that other people are not sure of their religion. The proof offered by him for this is that "these non-Muslims follow their respective false religions." Any person with some intellect can see through the drivel Naik speaks.
Has not Naik indirectly mocked and laughed at the non-Muslims? On the one hand, he "appreciates" that non-Muslims give Muslims the right to propagate Islam and build mosques in their country. On the other, he says that Muslims should never give these same rights to the non-Muslims.
Dr. Naik is “begging the question” of “truth”. It is not decided universally according to the scientific method that Islam is “God’s religion”. That is a claim that Dr. Naik has merely claimed, but not proved. He "begs" us to accept this as proven so he may win the argument. While 2 + 2 = 4 IS established by the science of mathematics, the supremacy of Islam is a religious opinion and cannot thus be supported by science. All school principals are accredited by a board of education elected by the parents and voters of the school district. No school principal in the world is appointed directly by God. All are answerable, not to God, but to those to whom they owe their job. That is an additional fallacy on the part of Dr. Naik. Scientific truth is different from religious truth. The scientific method is a very rigorous set of standards used to eliminate false conclusions. Dr. Naik is a heedless simplifier arguing (without proof) that the present-day Muslim dictatorships (such as Saudi Arabia and Taliban areas...run by despotic tyrants) are obviously the chosen representatives of Allah and run their countries according to Allah’s rules in a supremacist manner. This is his subjective opinion, but it cannot be supported by science or mathematics any more than I can prove strawberry to be superior to chocolate. Dr. Naik is intolerant of all other opinions and refuses to recognize that more than 80% of humans believe Islam to be a false, obscurantist, supremacist cult which has no right whatsoever to overrule the Universal Declaration of Human Rights...which proclaims freedom of thought and of religion. It is not proved either that Dr. Naik or his favorite dictators are God’s appointed “school masters” over the world. That would merely be his own opinion of himself. He is begging the question of Islam’s supremacy in order to justify the denial of equality, freedom of religion and other human rights to anyone who disagrees with him.
Source:-Wiki Islam.
No comments:
Post a Comment