Thursday, 8 November 2012

"RELIGIOUS MISSION OF BROTHERHOOD AND PEACEFUL CO EXISTENCE :COURTESY ISLAMIC PRACTICE AND PERCEPTION"! 
KARACHI, Pakistan (AP) — They came after dusk and chanted into the night sky ‘‘Kill the Hindus, kill the children of the Hindus,’’ as they smashed religious icons, ripped golden bangles off women’s arms and flashed pistols. It wasn't the first time that the Hindu temple on the outskirts of P
akistan’s largest city was attacked, and residents here fear it will not be the last.

‘‘People don’t consider us as equal citizens. They beat us whenever they want,’’ said Mol Chand, one of the teenage boys gathered at the temple. ‘‘We have no place to worship now.’’

It was the second time the Sri Krishna Ram temple has been attacked, and this time the mob didn't even bother to disguise their faces. The small temple, surrounded by a stone wall, is a tiny religious outpost in a dusty, hardscrabble neighborhood so far on the outskirts of the city that a sign on the main road wishes people leaving Karachi a good journey.

Local Muslim residents blamed people from a nearby ethnic Pashtun village for the attack, which took place in late September on the Day of Love for the Prophet, a national holiday declared by the government in response to an anti-Islam film made in the U.S. No one was seriously injured in the attack.

It was the latest in a rising tide of violence and discrimination against Hindus in this 95 percent Muslim country, where Islamic extremism is growing. Pakistan’s Hindu community says it faces forced conversions of Hindu girls to Islam, a lack of legal recognition for their marriages, discrimination in services and physical abuse when they venture into the streets.

The story of the Hindu population in Pakistan is one of long decline. During partition in 1947, the violent separation of Pakistan and India into separate countries, hundreds of thousands of Hindus opted to migrate to India where Hinduism is the dominant religion. Those that remained and their descendants now make up a tiny fraction of Pakistan’s estimated 190 million citizens, and are mostly concentrated in Sindh province in the southern part of the country.

Signs of their former stature abound in Karachi, the capital of Sindh. At the 150-year-old Swami Narayan Temple along one of the city’s main roads, thousands of Hindus gather during the year to celebrate major religious holidays. Hindus at the 200-year-old Laxmi Narain Temple scatter the ashes of their cremated loved ones in the waters of an inlet from the Arabian Ocean.

But there are also signs of how far the community has fallen. Residents in a city hungry for land have begun to build over Hindu cemeteries, the community’s leaders say. Hindus helped build Karachi’s port decades ago, but none work there now.

Estimates of the size of the Hindu population in Pakistan are all over the map — from 2.5 million or 10 million in Sindh province alone to 7 million across the country — a reflection of the fact that the country hasn't had a census since 1998.

It isn't just Hindus who are facing problems. Other minorities like Christians, the mystical Muslim branch of Sufis and the Ahmadi sect have found themselves under attack in Pakistan, where the rise of Muslim fundamentalists has sometimes unleashed a violent opposition against those who don’t follow their strict religious tenets.

The discrimination has prompted some Hindus to leave for India, activists warn, though the extent is not known. Around 3,000 Hindus left this year, part of a migration that began four years ago, sparked by discrimination and a general rise in crime in Sindh, said DM Maharaj, who heads an organization to help Hindus called Pakistan Hindu Sabha.

He said he recently talked to a group of Hindus preparing to move to India from rural Sindh, complaining that they can’t eat in Muslim restaurants or that Muslim officials turned them down for farming loans. Even during recent floods, they said Muslims did not want them staying in the same refugee camps.

Other Hindu figures such as provincial assembly member Pitamber Swami deny there’s a migration at all, in a reflection of how sensitive the issue is. Earlier this year, there were a string of reports in Pakistani media about Hindus leaving the country, sparking a flurry of promises by Pakistani officials to investigate.

In India, a Home office official said the Indian government noticed an upward trend of people coming from Pakistan but called reports of Pakistanis fleeing to India ‘‘exaggerated.’’ He said he does not have exact figures on how many Pakistani Hindus have stayed in India after entering the country on tourist visas. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the topic.

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

RATIONALISTIC REFERENCE FROM VALMIKI RAMAYAN;
AYUDYA KAND, CHAPTER 108,VERSE 14-15-16-17.
A Brahman named Jabali tries to persuade Rama to accept the kingdom by advocating the theory of nastikas [non believers]. 

aShTakaa pitR^i daivatyam ity ayam prasR^ito janaH |
annasya upadravam pashya mR^ito hi kim ashiShyati || 2-108-14
14. ayam= these; janaH= people; prasR^itaH= say; iti= that; aS
Takaa= the eight day; pitR^idaivatyam= should be given up to sacrifices for the spirits of our ancestors; pashya= see; upadravam= the waste annasya= of food; kim= what; mR^itaH= (will) a dead man; ashiSyati= eat?
"These people say, 'The eighth day should be given up to sacrifices for the spirits of our ancestors.' See the waste of food. What will a dead man eat?"

Verse Locator
yadi bhuktam iha anyena deham anyasya gagcCati |
dadyaat pravasataH shraaddham na tat pathy ashanam bhavet || 2-108-15
15. yadi bhuktam= If food eaten; anyena= by one; iha= here; gachchhati= reaches; anyasya= another's; deham= body; shraaddham= (then let) a sacrifice; dadyaat= be offered; pravasataH= for those who are setting out on a distant journey; tat na bhavet= will it not become; ashanam= a food; pathi= on their path?
"If food eaten by one here, reaches another's body, then let a sacrifice be offered for those who are setting out on a distant journey. Will it not become a food on their path?"*

Verse Locator
daana samvananaa hy ete granthaa medhaavibhiH kR^itaaH |
yajasva dehi diikShasva tapaH tapyasva samtyaja || 2-108-16
16. yajasva= perform sacrifices dehi= distribute gifts; diikSasva= consecrate yourselves; tapyasva= practise; tapaH= austerity; samtyaja= and renunciation; ete= there granthaaH= writings; kR^itaaH= are composed; medhaavibhiH= by learned men; daana samvananaaH= for the sake of inducing others to give.
"Perform sacrifices, distribute gifts, consecrate yourselves, practice austerity and renunciation' - These writings are composed by learned men for the sake of inducing others to give."

Verse Locator
sa na asti param ity eva kuru buddhim mahaa mate |
pratyakSham yat tad aatiShTha parokSham pR^iShThataH kuru || 2-108-17
17. mahaamate= O, the highly wise!; saH= you as such; kuru= arrive at; buddhim= a conclusion; naasti ityeva= that there is nothing; param= beyond this universe; aatiSTha= give precedence; tat= to that; yat= which; pratyakSam= meets the eye; pR^iSThataH kuru= and turn your back; parokSam= on what is beyond our knowledge.
"O, the highly wise! Arrive at a conclusion, therefore, that there is nothing beyond this Universe. Give precedence to that which meets the eye and turn your back on what is beyond our knowledge."
*The same exposition has been provided by Charvaka in Charvaka darshan.

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

POLITICIANS PENCHANT FOR PUTTING THEIR FOOT IN THE MOUTH ! 
Nitin Gadkari put his foot in his mouth by equating under world Dawn Dawood Ibhrahm's IQ with that of Swami Vivekananda. 
Politicians’ penchant for putting their foot in the mouth often lands them in the soup. Here are a few examples:

“ I don’t think a
 person like ( Salman) Khurshid will do anything for an amount like ` 71 lakh. It is a very small amount for a central minister” — Beni Prasad Verma in Oct 2012 The Union steel minister was defending Khurshid on the allegations of misappropriation of funds by his NGO. This was just one of his many gaffes. In the past, he kicked up a storm by saying that he was happy with rising prices; on another occasion, he suggested Manmohan Singh was too old to be PM “ A new victory and new marriage have their own importance.

Old wives lose their charm, there’s no enjoyment” — Sriprakash Jaiswal in Sept 2012 The Union coal minister made the crass remark during a poetry meet at a girls’ college in Kanpur after receiving the news of India’s victory over Pakistan in a T20 match.

Widely condemned for the sexist comment, he later apologised “ Bade dakarte the sher jaise, aur kutte ke jaise ban kar Soniaji aur Congress ke ghar par talve chatne lage ( These leaders were roaring like lions but later bowed like dogs to lick the feet of Sonia and the Congress)” — Nitin Gadkari in May 2010 The BJP chief was referring to Lalu Prasad and Mulayam Singh Yadav, who refused to support the party during the vote on cut motion in Parliament. Lalu asked Gadkari to “ hold his ears and apologise”; SP threatened to take legal action; other parties also condemned his remark “ Throw the money at Mayawati’s face and tell her ‘ you should also be raped and we are ready to give you ` 1 crore’” — Rita Bahuguna Joshi in July 2009 The then UP Congress chief made the provocative comment at a public rally, slamming then CM Mayawati’s decision to give a compensation of ` 25,000 to Dalit rape victims. She was arrested and jailed, BSP workers set her house in Lucknow on fire, Cong distanced itself from the row; Joshi later expressed regret “ Had it not been Sandeep’s house, not even a dog would have glanced that way” — V. S. Achuthanandan in Dec 2008 The then Kerala CM made the distasteful comment after the angry father of 26/ 11 martyr, NSG officer Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan, refused to let him inside his house to express condolence.

There was a nation- wide outrage. Achuthanandan initially dug in his heels but later bowed down to public pressure and expressed “ deep regret”.

Friday, 2 November 2012

SUPER STORM SANDY "GOD'S PUNISHMENT" ! 
A group of Muslim clerics have joined some Christian preachers in blaming the super storm which has devastated areas of America, Haiti and Cuba on the wrath of God.

Anti-American Muslim clerics said Sandy was a divine punishment for a film which mocks the Prophet Mohammad or for other perceived ills of American society. The film
 caused widespread protest in September as some Muslims demanded its removal from websites.

"Some people wonder about the hurricane in America and its causes," Egyptian hard line cleric Wagdi Ghoneim wrote in two messages on Twitter this week in the aftermath of the storm. "In my opinion, it is revenge from God for the beloved prophet," he added, alluding to the film, Reuters reported.

And, in Saudi Arabia, the cleric Salman al-Audah said the storm, which has killed more than 140 people and rising, was a wake-up call for Americans to convert to Islam.

But the clerics' remarks attracted criticism from other Muslims, who said it was wrong to relish the suffering of others. "God, shake the earth under their feet," read one comment, which prompted the response: "We have brothers and friends in America - I don't wish them any harm."

While Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia Abdel Aziz Al Sheik warned that rejoicing over the plight of the suffering runs contrary to Islam, adding that Muslims were among the victims. "It is not legitimate and it is not proper," he told pan-Arab Al-Hayat daily yesterday.

A Twitter response to Ghoneim, however, compared Sandy to a divine wind sent to destroy a sinful nation and strike at the seat of the United Nations in New York. "We ask God to destroy the UN building for its injustice, corruption, tyranny ... with Sandy," Reuters reported.

Others retorted: "This hashtag doesn't represent Muslims but represents a terrorist. We all ask God to help and save Americans."

In Iran, prominent clerics often avoid drawing parallels between natural disasters and divine intervention because their own country has faced devastating earthquakes, such as one in 2003 that killed 26,000 when it hit the ancient city of Bam.

On Wednesday, the Iranian Red Crescent said aid workers were ready to fly to New York to help with recovery efforts, the semiofficial Fars news agency reported. Mahmud Mozaffar, head of Red Crescent's rescue operations, said the Iranian groups had "ample experience" in dealing with natural catastrophes.

Thursday, 1 November 2012

‎"KARWA CHAUT "TODAY;
REASONS TO CELEBRATE "KARWA CHAUT"AMONG SOME SECTIONS OF HINDU WOMEN !
It is really surprising why so many so called educated-enlightened Hindu women observe "karwa chaut"while their respective men have no such rite to follow or observe for the longevity and well being [???] of their wives-symbolizing once again male chauvinism.I wonder what might be the main motivation for such mythological superstition one or more of the following:-
*To prove that she loves husband,all despite discord,conflict and reservations against her husband ?
*To make the husband and/or his family [in laws] happy!
*Pressure and compulsion from society and peers to follow traditional ritualism !
*The psychological fear that if she does not follow tradition with closed eyes and recite mantra and story parrot like,her hubby might be in trouble!
At least the educated person need to realize that "tradition"must not be the exclusive cause to follow superstition and whether such blind dogmas really provide any "divine benefit and benevolence" in practice and perception?

Sunday, 28 October 2012

Religious Customs
Are Amazingly Stupid

The Chinese make paper replicas of houses, animals, utensils, tools, and burn them on the raves of their departed relatives, claiming that this sends them to the spirit of the departed who can thus use them in the spirit world. Similar customs prevail in the religions of many primitive races. But Christians deride the silly custom, and all sensible people kn
ow that it is childish, as reason does not approve the ritual.

Christian customs are just as ridiculous. Eating pinches of bread and sipping wine or grape juice are supposed to give the Christian a taste of the flesh and blood of Christ -- of course, the bread and wine must first be blessed by the priest or preacher, and by magic incantations and abracadabra, rig-a-ma-role and hocus-pocus transferred into the things it is claimed to be. It is thus impossible for the Christian church to get away from the cannibalistic theory of blood sacrifices, which is the tail end of the old primitive cannibalistic customs even now practiced by some savage tribes, of eating their enemies in order to partake of their valor art courageous qualities. The old Mexican Aztec custom of eating or cutting out the heart of its brave young men is similar. The whole of religion is based on morbidity. Anything promoting happiness is supposed to be wrong.

The Christian religion has attacked sex and sex desire as one of the greatest sins. Catholic priests are supposed to be celibates, and nuns and monks are required to take an oath that they will never have sexual satisfaction. Why did the church not attack God for making men desirous of fulfilling the sex instinct? But this queer custom, like that of the Chinese, once started, never stops.

We think that the Tibetan Lamas system of saying prayers by having the wind turn paddles, and rivers turn water wheels with prayer printed or written on them is foolish. But the Tibetan thinks these systems of appeasing the Almighty are just as efficacious as the counting of the Rosary by Catholics.

There is no logical explanation for these things. There is no reasonable explanation for the Christians' attitude toward sex, but it is well illustrated by the stories printed in the "London Freethinker":

"A parson's daughter in failing health took up a position in a farmhouse, and, after a few weeks gave it up. Asked by the farmer's wife, who had done her utmost for the girl, if she could give her anything more, she replied: 'I lack nothing, but I cannot stay here any longer -- the poultry are so disgustingly immoral.'"

"An elder, who lived in the same Scottish village, kept a few fowls. On Sunday the old follower of Calvin gave only his hens their liberty. The cocks he tethered to the table legs. 'It wadnae doe,' said he, 'tee let them disgrace ma sacred callin by gaen them freedom, the wandering vagabonds to gang aboot fornicating the Lord's day.'"

Whole tribes of primitive people have been wiped out or nearly exterminated by the Christian missionaries' insane zeal for putting clothes on tropical tribesmen whose skins had been exposed to the healthy air and Sun from time immemorial.

If god had wanted people to be prudes, why did he fill their bodies and minds with desire? If it was a sin to exercise sex desires, why did he not create man without sex organs? Why did he not make priests from the beginning without them, as certain insects are so born? Or why does not the Catholic Church unsex all of its nuns, monks, and priests?

The head-hunting tribes of Borneo require that a man must cut off some person's head, man or woman or child, before he can be called a man and marry. What a stupid custom, we think; no reason, no sense. How did it originate? Of course there are psychological causes which are not founded on reason: but once started such customs survive as long as there is a profit in them for someone.

For example the strange and primitive ritual of baptism. Nothing more childish could be imagined. Why does the silly rite continue? Probably because the preacher or priest gets from 50¢ to $5 every time he sprinkles a drop or two of water on a child's head and chants a few tunes and mumbles a few meaningless words.

On the battle field priests are supposed to rush to dying men and administer last rites. If they would put their efforts into trying to save these men from death their efforts would be more practical. When a man is unconscious what matter is it to him what mumbling some cleric makes over him?[The case against religion].

Friday, 26 October 2012

ANIMALS ARE KILLED TO THIS DAY TO APPEASE THE SUPPOSEDLY MERCIFUL GOD! 
"The superficial truth is some times a blatant lie.While the errors of History can never be accidental:the writer only knew what was known at the time.[Brokaan] 
Today, Islam is the only religion that practices blood sacrifice as a ritualistic norm on huge scale, which increase by the year! An animal sacrifice in Arabic is called ḏabiḥa (ذَبِيْحَة) or Qurbani (قُرْبَان). The term may have roots from the Jewish term Korban; in some places such as in Pakistan, qurbani is always used for Islamic animal sacrifice. In the Islamic context, an animal sacrifice referred to as ḏabiḥa (ذَبِيْحَة) meaning "sacrifice as a ritual" is offered only in Eid ul-Adha. The sacrificial animal may be a lamb, a sheep, a goat, a camel, or a cow. The animal must be healthy and conscious. "Therefore to the Lord turn in Prayer and Sacrifice." (Surah Al-Kawthar) Quran, 108.2 Qurbani is an Islamic prescription for the affluent to share their good fortunes with the needy in the community. On the occasion of Eid ul Adha (Festival of Sacrifice), affluent Muslims all over the world perform the Sunnah of Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) by sacrificing a cow, camel, goat or sheep. The meat is then divided into three equal parts. One part is retained by the person, who offers the holy sacrifice to Allah. The second is given to his relatives. The third part is distributed amongst the poor. The Qur'an states that the sacrifice has nothing to do with the blood and gore (Qur'an 22:37: "It is not their meat nor their blood that reaches Allah. It is your piety that reaches Him..."). Rather, it is done to help the poor and in remembrance of Prophet Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his son Ishmael at God's command.

Let's face it. Religious scriptures are full of Blood Sacrifices and killings, all in the name of God or Deity. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?" [Courtesy: ISLAM WATCH].